Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander peoples have been managing Australian natural resources for more than
60,000 years. The diversity of peoples and landscapes has led to a huge range
of techniques appropriate to local areas. We will look at a few of the
practices in the area that is now New South Wales.
Map of
the Aboriginal tribes of New South Wales by John Fraser, published in an
Australian Language in 1892 (public domain)
Burning for biodiversity and
resilient landscapes
Cultural
burning has been used by Aboriginal peoples across Australia to manage land and
increase biodiversity. Small, controlled fires are set based upon deep
knowledge of the local area and its response to fire. Fire helps rejuvenate
local plants and benefits wildlife. Fire may also be used to clear important
pathways and for fuel reduction.
After tens
of thousands of years of fire management, many Australian plants and animals
are adapted to fire. After fire, grass trees (Xanthorrhoea) flower, Banksia
and Hakea species release their seeds and other plants sprout from
underground roots. Animals respond to the different opportunities provided by
recent burning. Kangaroos prefer the fresh grass that quickly sprouts after a
burn, whereas other animals prefer successional vegetation that grows a few
years after fire.
Xanthorrhoea being burnt (JarrahTree 2010,
Wikimedia Creative Commons)
Xanthorrhoea flowering (Jody Oz 2017, Wikimedia
Creative Commons)
Aboriginal
knowledge of Country is vital for fire management. Small fires set at different
times create a diverse patchwork of habitats. Weeds may be controlled with more
intense burning, whist some patches may be managed with infrequent, cooler
fires. Managers working on Country consider the lifecycles of plants and
animals in their decisions.
One example
of cultural burning is in the Tathra area. The Bega Local Aboriginal Land
Council conducted a cultural burn in 2017. A large bushfire in 2018 devastated
areas that had experienced standard hazard reduction burns, but not the area
that had been treated with cultural burning. Hazard reduction burns aim to
reduce fuel load, whereas cultural burning focuses on the type of regrowth
after burning and maintaining soil moisture.
Webpages:
- Cultural burning: healthy communities, healthy landscapes
(Firesticks) - Aboriginalcommunities call for ongoing funding of cultural burning for bushfire mitigation (2020)
(ABC News)
Videos:
- Fighting Fire with Fire
(Australian Story) - Indigenous fire methods protect land before and after the Tathra bushfire (2018)
(ABC Australia)
Working with other land managers
There are a variety of formal and
informal ways that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples engage in land
management. Indigenous Protected Areas (IPAs) represent nearly 44% of the
National Reserve System, covering more than 67 million hectares of land and sea
in 76 dedicated IPAs. Funding and employment are provided for traditional
owners to care for Country and Place. Examples from NSW include urban and rural
areas such as:
- Gamay (Botany Bay) Rangers who manage land owned by the La Perouse Local Aboriginal Land Council in Sydney, and
- Willandra Lakes Rangers who work in partnership with landholders and the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service to conserve 2.4 million hectares in the Willandra Lakes World Heritage Area.
Lake
Mungo National Park is part of the Willandra Lakes World Heritage Area. Lake
Mungo is the site of the oldest documented cremation (Mungo Lady 40,000 years
ago) and contains many Aboriginal artefacts and remains. (RK Jolley 2017,
Wikipedia Creative Commons)
The NSW Department of Planning,
Industry and Environment (DPIE) has three main formats for working with
Aboriginal communities to manages parks and reserves.
- Aboriginal ownership and lease-back agreements involve management by a Board that consists of a majority of Aboriginal owners with the DPIE, local government, conservation group(s) and local landholder representatives. Aboriginal owners have a central role in running the park or reserve.
- A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), formalises a relationship between the local Aboriginal community and the DPIE but does not involve payment and is not legally binding. The MOU does not resolve native title.
- An Indigenous land use agreement (ILUA) recognises native title and establishes joint management with the NSW Government. The ILUA allows development of the land and addresses compensation for the native title group.
All types of agreement allow
traditional owners to engage in management of Country, working alongside the
NSW Government and other stakeholders. The relative role of each group changes
with the type of ownership and individual negotiations. The Gundungurra ILUA
covers nearly 7,000 km2 south west of Sydney, including some of the
Blue Mountains World Heritage Area. Gundungurra organisations have greater
input into management of the lands in order to protect Aboriginal heritage and
allow traditional owners to participate in cultural activities.
Webpages:
- Aboriginal joint management of parks(NSW Department of
Planning, Industry and Environment)
- Indigenous Protected Areas
(Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment)